Shruti Bhat PhD, MBA, Operations Excellence Expert
  • Home
  • About Shruti
  • Books
  • Insights
  • Operational Excellence
  • Articles
    • Innovation Management and R&D Leadership
    • Product Development
    • Business Transformation
    • Process Improvement
    • Business Continuity
    • Change Management
    • Digital Transformation
    • Quality Improvement
  • Tools
    • Whitepapers
    • Checklists and Templates
    • Free eBook
    • Videos
  • Engage Shruti
    • Consulting >
      • Operational Excellence Consulting
      • Business Transformation Consulting
      • Innovation Management Consulting
    • Workshops
  • Case Studies
  • Blog
  • Contact

Practical Considerations And Strategies In Drafting U.S. Patent Applications

2/22/2010

0 Comments

 
United States patent law probably ranks as one of the most sophisticated and complex bodies of law in the world. Under the U.S. patent law, a patent not only serves as a technical disclosure for an invention to be protected, but also defines the boundaries of exclusive rights granted by the U.S. government to protect the invention.

As a legal document, a U.S. patent is subjected to legal interpretation and strict scrutiny of the U.S. court system. As more Chinese companies start pursuing patent protection in the United States, they should be aware of general strategies and considerations when preparing U.S. patent applications or, more particularly, specifications and claims of the U.S. patent applications.

 
Importance of Carefully Drafted Specifications and Claims-  

Many people, including patent attorneys, often pay more attention to drafting claims than drafting specifications. In reality, however, the specification is as important as, if not more important than, the claims. To take just one example, the claims can be amended during the prosecution to redefine the scope of patent protection. But the specification can rarely be changed during prosecution, which means the applicant only gets one opportunity to explain how the invention works. 

In the world of patent litigation, specifications and claims always go hand-in-hand. A carefully drafted specification is particularly important when the federal district judge interprets the patent claims, for the claims must be read in light of the specification. In Phillips v. AWH Corp.,the Federal Circuit recently clarified the role of the specification when a federal district judge seeks to ascertain the proper scope of patent claims. 

In Phillips, the Federal Circuit held that "the specification 'is always highly relevant to the claim construction analysis. Usually, it is dispositive; it is the single best guide to the meaning of a disputed term.'That is, a carefully drafted specification can resolve a dispute over claim terms without resort to any extrinsic evidence. A good strategy for a patent applicant is thus to take advantage of Phillips and assume more control over claim construction in any future litigation by carefully drafting the specification. 

Of course, carefully drafted claims are also essential for any patent protection because the claims directly set the scope and boundaries of the patent rights. A careless mistake, no matter how small or innocent, may have the biggest impact on the outcome of a patent litigation. 

For example, in Chef America, Inc. v. Lamb-Weston, Inc.,Chef America tried to protect a cooking step for heating a dough at a certain temperature inside an oven. But Chef America drafted the claim to read "heating the . . . dough to a temperature in the range of about 400 degrees F. to 850 degrees F." The Federal Circuit reasoned that "to" is not "at" and, thus, the claim required the dough (not the oven) to be heated to the specified temperature. The Court then ruled that the claim was not infringed. In fact, under the Court's claim construction, this claim could not possibly be infringed unless one wanted to make burned dough. 

Another example shows the importance of carefully choosing alternative language when drafting claims. In Kustom Signals, Inc. v. Applied Concepts, Inc., Kustom Signals added the limitation "selecting either a greatest magnitude or highest frequency search" to the claim during prosecution and later sued Applied Concepts for patent infringement. But Applied Concept's device searched both magnitude and frequency.

​The Federal Circuit reasoned that "or" is not "and/or" and the claim only covered a choice between either one of two alternatives, not both. The Court then affirmed a ruling of non-infringement by Applied Concept's device. The outcome was indeed unfortunate for Kustom Signal, but it could have avoided the problem by carefully drafting the claim to read, for example, "selecting at least one of a greatest magnitude search and a highest frequency search."
 

Drafting the Specification-  

Astute drafters of U.S. patent applications always follow a list of "do's and don'ts."  Details of the complexities, ways of drafting US patents and case studies of successes with USPTO are available as a technical white paper. Its FREE for our registered readers. To register, contact us. 

​Disclaimer- In addition to Terms and Conditions of this blog, the content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.
​


Follow Shruti on Twitter, Facebook, YouTube, LinkedIn
0 Comments

Your comment will be posted after it is approved.


Leave a Reply.

    Shruti Bhat, global leader in business turnaround, operational excellence and continuous improvement
    To contact Dr. Shruti Bhat text or WhatsApp at 1.403.969.6219

    New Book Released!

    Revolutionizing Industries with Lean Six Sigma

    Shruti's YouTube Channel ...

    Picture

    Blog Categories

    All
    3D Printing
    Agile
    Artificial Intelligence
    Automation
    Biotechnology
    Books
    Business Continuity
    Business Turnaround
    Case Studies
    Change Management
    Checklists
    Chemical Industry
    Continuous Improvement
    Design Thinking
    Digitalization
    Drug Delivery
    External News Links
    Hall Of Fame
    Healthcare
    Hoshin Kanri
    HR Development
    Innovation
    Insights
    ISO
    Just In Time
    Kaizen
    Leadership
    LEAN
    Lean Six Sigma
    Life Sciences
    Machine Learning
    Manufacturing
    Medical Devices
    Mistake Proofing
    Motivational Cards
    MSMEs
    Nanotechnology
    Operational Excellence
    Packaging
    Patents
    Personal Products
    Process Improvement
    Product Development
    Productivity Increase
    QbD
    Quality Management
    R&D Leadership
    Robotics
    Service Industry
    Six Sigma
    Strategy
    Supply Chain Logistics
    Telecom Industry
    Templates
    TQM
    Videos
    Voice Of Customer
    Whitepaper
    Workshops

    Shruti's books...

    Picture
    top ten strategic decision-making tools for operational excellence
    shruti bhat, business process management, continuous improvement
    kaizen for pharmaceutcials, medical devices and biotech industry book by Dr Shruti Bhat
    Book on Continuous improvement tools by Dr Shruti Bhat
    kaizen for leaders, continuous process improvement tool to increase profit and organizational excellence by shruti bhat
    kaizen, shruti bhat, continuous improvement, quality, operations management
    how to lead a successful business transformation
    leading organizations through crisis
    emotional intelligence
    how to overcome challenges of creating effective teams
    modular kaizen Vs Blitz kaizen
    How to increase employee engagement as a new boss

    ​Micro-Learning
    ​Partner

    Picture

    Wellness
    ​Partner

    Picture

Connect with Dr. Shruti Bhat at- ​Twitter, YouTube, LinkedIn​

© Copyright 1992- 2025 Dr. Shruti Bhat ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.
See Terms and Conditions for details on this site usage.
Subscribe to Operational Excellence Academy YouTube Channel
​Subscribe to Operational Excellence Academy YouTube Channel
SHRUTI BHAT, CONTACT
Click to connect.
Created by Macro2Micro Media