DNA targeting could pinpoint early cancers or deliver radiotherapy straight to the tumor. U.K. researchers have found a way to test for a protein that could become a biomarker for many different types of cancer. The DNA damage-signaling protein, γH2AX (gamma-H2AX), signposts the points where both strands of the DNA double helix have broken, one of the first steps in development of cancer (known as tumorigenesis). The team from Oxford University's Gray Institute for Radiation Oncology and Biology has built an imaging probe that targets this protein. The probe is in three parts--an anti-γH2AX antibody that targets the biomarker, a peptide (TAT) that penetrates the cell, and 111In, a radioactive marker used as an imaging agent. To test out the concept, the researchers used the probe and SPECT imaging to find DNA damage in a type of genetically modified mice that tend to develop breast cancer lumps that can be felt after around 17 weeks. The test spotted potential cancers in mice up to 5 weeks before they developed these lumps. The same marker is also seen in lung, skin, kidney and bladder cancer. Katherine Vallis of the institute told BBC News: "If larger studies confirm this, the protein could provide a new route to detect cancer at its very earliest stage--when it is easier to treat successfully." As well as being a biomarker for many cancers, this finding could also lead to a way to deliver radiotherapy directly to the damaged cells and monitor its effects, treating established tumors or even heading off cancers almost before they start. As Vallis explained to BBC News, the system is "self-amplifying" because the radiotherapy will cause further damage to the cells, therefore attracting more antibodies that will deliver more radiation, eventually killing the cancer cells. However, the technology has only been studied in mice so far, and it is a long way off use in humans.
 Dr.Shruti Bhat, Star formulator and Ace leader within pharmaceutical R&D,a specialist with hiTech formulations and quality-by-design. Shruti brings to you some highlights from current pharma and clinical research news, views and data. The bacteria that thrive in our guts could become the key ingredients for a new generation of treatments that fight everything from life-threatening infections to diabetes, obesity, depression and bowel diseases, according to a team of scientists who have experienced some intriguing early successes with transplants.According to a report in MIT's Technology Review, the scientists were able to cure an infection in a female patient with bacteria transplanted from her husband's gut. Transplanting microbial populations from a healthy person to the sick could transform their entire intestinal system--something that has implications for a broad range of diseases. And it would be a far more radical approach than encouraging people to eat yogurt or take other dietary actions designed to foster healthy microbes.The researchers have also tested this approach in rats and found that they could make significant changes in their intestinal ecosystems. Significantly, the scientists say they saw no evidence that the rat's body rejected the transplant. Read more: Gut microbes could offer new therapeutic platform - FierceBiotech Researchhttp://www.fiercebiotechresearch.com/story/gut-microbes-could-offer-new-therapeutic-platform/2010-09-07?utm_medium=nl&utm_source=internal#ixzz0yrPIRrEjDisclaimer- The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.Http://www.drshrutibhat.comExpert at leading Pharmaceutical R&D.Translates innovative concepts to PROFITS.YouTube Channel : Http://www.youtube.com/user/ShrutiBhat10
 Dr.Shruti Bhat, Star formulator and Ace leader within pharmaceutical R&D,a specialist with hiTech formulations and quality-by-design. Shruti brings to you some highlights from current pharma and clinical research news, views and data.
More and more drug makers are turning to reformulation to prolong the lifecycle of their top sellers and protect precious revenue from generic copies, as well as supplement dwindling pipelines. The fact that 39 per cent of the total product launches from the 50 top manufacturers between 2002 and 2005 were reformulations is a clear indication of the presence of this trend. Central nervous system (CNS), alimentary and metabolic therapies are the most frequently targeted for reformulation, according to a new research report by Datamonitor. Within the CNS market, reformulated products are predominantly antipsychotics, antidepressants, and ADHD and pain therapies. Reformulated stomach ulcer and insulin therapies make up the bulk of alimentary and metabolic reformulations, while respiratory, anti-infective and genito-urinary and sex hormone therapies have also experienced frequent reformulation, the report says. "This reflects the large patient populations within the major indications of these therapy areas, the high commercial value of many of the products and the highly competitive nature of the markets," said Alistair Sinclair, Datamonitor pharmaceutical markets analyst and report author. "All of which drive companies to be more active in gaining a competitive advantage within the respective markets, but most of all; with product development pipelines looking increasingly barren, on top of spiralling R&D costs, pharmaceutical companies must ensure they maximise revenues of existing brands." Reformulations within these categories include soluble tablets, chewable tablets, extended release tablets, oral liquids and suspensions, pre-filled syringes, transdermal patches, and a variety of gels and creams. Converting injectable drugs into non-injectable forms of delivery is proving particularly popular. However, for all the strategy and planning involved, the success of a reformulation is heavily dependent on the manufacturer's ability to develop an improved version of the original drug, said the report, titled: "Reformulation Strategies - Comparisons of Past and Future Reformulation Strategies." "The key to a successful reformulation is to provide clear therapeutic benefits over their predecessor", said Sinclair. "First and foremost, manufacturers need to ensure there is a market need for their reformulated products, and then ensure the drug displays sufficient differentiation from the original, particularly in terms of efficacy and side effects; launch timing is also of key importance." For many firms this is a daunting task, as they may not have sufficient in-house resources or expertise to rise to the challenge. Therefore, this reformulation trend is good news for the drug formulation industry, which has seen a 38 per cent growth in the past five years and is expected to continue to boom, as drug companies wishing to reformulate are outsourcing the function to specialist formulation companies. Reformulation is still quite a niche field and there are relatively few companies in the world that specialise in individual reformulation areas. Firms that do are now finding themselves inundated with new business. For example, UK form Medpharm said it has been experiencing a growing business demand for topical formulations of drugs, in which it specialises. According to the firm, there is only one other company in the US that specialises in topical drug formulation and provides the full range of services, from mathematical modelling of a drug profile, through to formulation development and optimisation and manufacturing. Disclaimer- The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances. Http://www.drshrutibhat.com Expert at leading Pharmaceutical R&D. Translates innovative concepts to PROFITS. YouTube Channel : Http://www.youtube.com/user/ShrutiBhat10
 Dr.Shruti Bhat, Star formulator and Ace leader within pharmaceutical R&D,a specialist with hiTech formulations and quality-by-design. Shruti brings to you some highlights from current pharma and clinical research news, views and data. Bloomberg News reports that a study in the medical journal Gut found that "people who take even a very low dose of aspirin every day for five years can cut the risk of developing colon cancer by almost a third." According to researchers, "as little as 75 milligrams of aspirin a day...lowered the risk of colon cancer by 22 percent after just a year." While it was already know that aspirin can protect the colon, the "study showed for the first time that a low dose of aspirin is sufficient to ward off cancer, and that the drug needs to be taken for at least five years to get the full benefit." According to MedPage Today "Aspirin has not as yet been recommended for primary chemoprevention of colorectal cancer...because of unanswered questions on dose, duration, and effects on survival." WebMD the UK's Press Association and the UK's Daily Mail also covered this study. References: http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2010-09-15/low-dose-of-aspirin-taken-daily-cuts-colon-cancer-risk-researchers-find.htmlhttp://www.medpagetoday.com/HematologyOncology/ColonCancer/22207http://www.webmd.com/cancer/news/20100915/low-dose-aspirin-lowers-risk-of-colorectal-cancer?src=RSS_PUBLIChttp://www.google.com/hostednews/ukpress/article/ALeqM5hFNKz7ksAdXZuXyQDViwYLSYFdBwhttp://www.dailymail.co.uk/health/article-1312475/Aspirin-cuts-bowel-cancer-risk-22.html
Disclaimer- The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.
Http://www.drshrutibhat.com Expert at leading Pharmaceutical R&D. Translates innovative concepts to PROFITS. YouTube Channel : Http://www.youtube.com/user/ShrutiBhat10
 Dr.Shruti Bhat, Star formulator and Ace leader within pharmaceutical R&D,a specialist with hiTech formulations and quality-by-design. Shruti brings to you some highlights from current pharma and clinical research news, views and data. On its website, ABC News reported, "A former Food and Drug Administration official who helped get the vision correction surgery LASIK approved back in the 1990s but later spoke out against the procedure is taking his concerns directly to current regulators at the FDA." Yesterday, "Morris Waxler, who is now an independent regulatory consultant, filed a citizen's petition...urging the agency to take steps to stop what he calls 'the epidemic of permanent vision problems' caused by LASIK." According to "Waxler's analysis of FDA data, half of LASIK patients experience side effects, and more than a third continue to need glasses or contacts," ABC World News (9/22, story 6, 1:55, Sawyer) reported. After being asked if he "would you ever recommend LASIK to somebody" he cares about, "knowing what" he "knows now," Dr. Waxler replied, "No, absolutely not." While the "industry counters that most LASIK side effects are minor or temporary, and that complications are much lower with today's modern LASIK," the agency nevertheless is "now reviewing the procedure." http://abcnews.go.com/Health/EyeHealth/lasik-advocate-files-petition-criticizing-procedure/story?id=11689793 Disclaimer- The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.Http://www.drshrutibhat.com Expert at leading Pharmaceutical R&D. Translates innovative concepts to PROFITS. YouTube Channel : Http://www.youtube.com/user/ShrutiBhat10
 Dr.Shruti Bhat, Star formulator and Ace leader within pharmaceutical R&D, a specialist with hiTech formulations and quality-by-design. Shruti brings to you some highlights from current pharma and clinical research news, views and data. Frederick Frank, a leading biotechnology banker and vice chairman ofinvestment advisory firm Peter J. Solomon, said Genzyme Corp (GENZ.O) has no chance of remaining an independent company.French drugmaker Sanofi-Aventis SA (SASY.PA) has made a hostile tender offer of $18.5 billion, or $69 a share, for the Cambridge, Massachusetts-based maker of drugs for rare diseases. Genzyme has rejected the bid but Sanofi is expected ultimately to prevail."Genzyme is history," Frank said at the Reuters Health Summit on Monday. "It's only a question of when and at what price." Genzyme's shares closed on Monday at $71.06, and Frank said that if a deal were to fall through the stock price would likely fall into the mid-$50 range."I would estimate that 40 to 50 percent of the shares are held in the arbitrage community," he said, referring to short-term investors who specialize in takeover targets. "That's a big load to be sold."Frank, former vice chairman of Lehman Brothers and, until 2009, of Barclays Capital, has advised on countless transactions in the pharmaceuticals and biotech sector.He said he expects mergers and acquisitions in the space to continue, since big pharmaceuticals companies are eager to acquire products to replace those that are losing patent protection.But once Genzyme is gone, there will only be a handful of large biotech companies left, including Amgen Inc (AMGN.O), Gilead Sciences Inc (GILD.O) and Biogen Idec Inc (BIIB.O). If and when they too disappear, it is unlikely the industry will see new companies of their ilk emerge, he said."Today, venture capitalists are willing to finance a company through mid-stage trials but with the goal of selling it at that point," he said. "You're not going to see a lot of new Amgens or Genentechs."Genentech, the oldest and second-biggest biotech after Amgen, was fully acquired by Swiss drugmaker Roche Holding AG (ROG.VX) in early 2009.Still, Frank said acquisitions will depend on valuations. Biogen Idec Inc (BIIB.O), which makes the multiple sclerosis drugs Avonex and Tysabri, has long been considered an acquisition target. But in 2007 the company tried and failed to sell itself.Frank said he was approached by a big pharmaceuticals company to represent them in a possible purchase of Biogen but he recommended against it."On the surface the numbers look very attractive," he said, "but their wonderful drug Tysabri, for a very small group of people, has the potential to kill you."Tysabri has been linked with PML, a potentially deadly brain infection, and is competing in an ever-more crowded space. Recently U.S. regulators approved the first oral MS drug, Gilenya, made by Novartis AG (NOVN.VX) that is widely expected to become a leading player in the space.Biogen is working on a test that could potentially screen patients at higher risk for developing PML, but uncertainty remains.Despite Sanofi's hostile bid for Genzyme, Frank does not expect hostile offers to increase."I don't think you'll see a lot of them," he said. "These companies are very management intensive; you do a hostile tender offer, you tend to lose the management."For big pharmaceuticals companies, a new era is at hand, in which insurance companies are increasingly in the driver's seat, he said."In the past, the payer community was not very active; the pharma companies set their prices and their prices were largely paid. Now the focus of power has changed."No longer can drug companies develop products with only marginal improvements over rival drugs. Payers won't pay, he said."We're entering a new world," he said. "Pharma companies are going to spend a lot of time developing first-in-class drugs."Disclaimer- The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances. Http://www.drshrutibhat.comExpert at leading Pharmaceutical R&D.Translates innovative concepts to PROFITS.YouTube Channel : Http://www.youtube.com/user/ShrutiBhat10
 Dr.Shruti Bhat, Star formulator and Ace leader within pharmaceutical R&D,a specialist with hiTech formulations and quality-by-design. Shruti brings to you some highlights from current pharma and clinical research news, views and data. A lineup of blockbuster monoclonal antibodies produced by a group of the world's top biopharma companies are now squarely in the crosshairs of the world's top biosimilar developers.Last Friday the European Medicines Agency laid out exactly what developers will need to do to gain approvals for follow-on antibody therapies. And Roche, with its lineup of aging cancer therapies like Rituxan, Herceptin and Avastin, was quickly singled out as the most vulnerable to a new lineup of competitive treatments that could hit the European market as early as 2012. The Financial Times also notes that Merck KGaA, Johnson & Johnson ($JNJ) and Abbott ($ABT) also face near-term competition from the biosimilar crowd. GlaxoSmithKline ($GSK) and AstraZeneca ($AZN) are likely to face new competition at a later stage.Several big outfits like Novartis ($NVS), Teva and Hospira ($HSP) are likely to lead the charge in creating biosimilar versions of the blockbuster antibodies. But it won't be cheap. The research group Collins Stewart has estimated that developers will need to budget $100 million for the kinds of clinical trials that will be required to gain an approval. And once they hit the market, the follow-ons are expected to offer discounts of 10 to 15 percent. Roche wants regulators to be cautious and slow. "We believe that patient safety must be of highest concern when evaluating the development, approval and marketing of biosimilar products." In the U.S., the FDA is just beginning the process of laying out the rules for developing biosimilars.EU adopts new biosimilar guideline :European regulators have adopted a guideline on biosimilar antibody drugs; industry can expect its publication in a couple of weeks. However, many experts already anticipate a cautious approach, requiring separate clinical trials for different diseases addressed by the same antibody, as Reuters notes.In a release, the EMA briefly touched on the guidelines, titled 'Similar Biological Medicinal Products Containing Monoclonal Antibodies,' which will be released for a five-month public consultation period. "This guideline lays down the nonclinical and clinical requirements for monoclonal antibody-containing medicines claiming to be similar to another one already marketed," it explains.Earlier this week, Lincoln Tsang, a partner at London law firm Arnold & Porter, told Reuters he expects the EMA to play it safe by requiring extensive testing. "My hunch is that they will be cautious in saying that if you can establish clinical efficacy and safety of a given product for a given indication you can't readily seek approval for another indication," he said. "Given it is such a big therapeutic area, I think they will not like to be seen to be too generous." As Reuters notes, such testing could drive up the costs of producing biosimilars, thus making it hard for smaller companies to enter the arena. If costs are too high, only well-established players like Teva, Novartis and Hospira might have the ability to bring such products to market.http://www.pharm-education.com/2010/11/blockbuster-antibodies-now-face-quick.html Disclaimer- The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances. Http://www.drshrutibhat.com Expert at leading Pharmaceutical R&D.Translates innovative concepts to PROFITS.YouTube Channel : Http://www.youtube.com/user/ShrutiBhat10
 Dr.Shruti Bhat, Star formulator and Ace leader within pharmaceutical R&D, a specialist with hiTech formulations and quality-by-design. Shruti brings to you some highlights from current pharma and clinical research news, views and data. Misoprostol May Be As Effective As Oxytocin In Speeding Labor For Women With Inadequate Contractions. "Titrated oral doses of misoprostol (Cytotec) may be as effective as intravenous oxytocin in speeding labor in women who have inadequate contractions, according to" a study published in J. Obstetrics & Gynecology. Taiwanese researchers found that in "a randomized trial of more than 200 Chinese women, the median times from treatment to vaginal delivery were virtually identical at 5.2 hours whether oral misoprostol or intravenous oxytocin was used." They also noted that there "were also no differences in adverse effects and birth outcomes, allaying concerns that oral misoprostol might not be as safe as intravenous oxytocin." Trastuzumab May Help Extend Stomach Cancer Patients' Survival By Nearly Three Months. Patients with HER2-positive advanced gastric cancer might benefit from a drug produced by Roche Holding AG. “Use of the drug trastuzumab in addition to chemotherapy can extend stomach cancer patients' survival by nearly three months," researchers in Seoul found after evaluating "584 patients at 122 centers in 24" nations. The "addition of trastuzumab to standard cisplatin/fluoropyrimidine chemotherapy resulted in a median survival of 13.8 months, compared with 11.1 months for patients who received chemotherapy alone -- a 26 percent difference." But, an editorial accompanying The Lancet paper questions the cost-effectiveness of that treatment. "In the 24 countries that contributed to the study, yearly health expenditure per citizen varies from $40 (£25) to $5,500, which reiterates the important moral question -- what is the justification for introducing a treatment that might enable one individual to live a few months longer, but will consume, for each person treated, the total yearly health expenditure for scores of their fellow citizens?" Breast Cancer Drug Fulvestrant Appears More Effective In The Presence Of CK8 And CK18. Women’s responsiveness to the second-line breast cancer drug fulvestrant may depend on whether the cancer cells are expressing two key proteins, Indiana University Bloomington scientists report in this month’s Cancer Biology & Therapy.Fulvestrant appeared to exert maximum anti-cancer effects in vitro when cells produced normal or elevated quantities of the cytokeratins CK8 and CK18, structural proteins that help give the nucleus its shape. For fulvestrant to work well, the cells must also be responsive to estrogen, and producing the estrogen receptor ER-alpha. ER-alpha’s importance to fulvestrant’s anti-estrogenic action had been established in previous reports. The present study confirms fulvestrant’s binding relationship to ER-alpha, while also showing two other proteins, cytokeratins 8 and 18, can strongly enhance fulvestrant’s anti-estrogenic activity. Testing for the presence of these three proteins, and perhaps many others, could help doctors decide whether fulvestrant should be prescribed to their patients.Eprotirome May Lower Cholesterol Levels Without Feared Side Effects Of Thyroid-Based Drugs. "A thyroid-derived cholesterol-lowering drug," called eprotirome, "that could be an alternative to the widely used statin medications has done well in a small, early trial, Swedish and American researchers report." For the 12-week trial, various doses of eprotirome "were added to statin treatment for 168 people whose high levels of LDL cholesterol had not been lowered by previous use of statins," and the combination was found to "lower cholesterol levels" and "did not cause the feared side effects...that have plagued similar thyroid-based treatments." Eprotirome, which is still several years away from the market, is unlikely to replace statins. Third Study Shows Bisphosphonates May Cut Risk Of Breast Cancer. According to a study appearing in the British Journal of Cancer, researchers "found a reduction in the risk for breast cancer among postmenopausal women taking bisphosphonates for the treatment of osteoporosis." The study showed that "the use of bisphosphonates was associated with a 30% reduction in the risk for breast cancer." The findings back results "reported in two other studies." Still, researchers remain unclear "how bisphosphonates could prevent breast cancer." Intravitreous Dexamethasone Effective Treatment For DME. According to a study published in the Archives of Ophthalmology, "intravitreous treatment with dexamethasone is well tolerated and significantly improves visual acuity in patients with persistent diabetic macular edema (DME)." In a trial in which 315 DME patients were randomized to intravitreous "dexamethasone 700 µg (n=105) or 350 µg (n=105) to one eye, or observation (n=105)," researchers found that "at day 90, a BCVA improvement of 10 letters or more was seen in 33.3%, 21.1%, and 12.3% of the dexamethasone 700 µg, 350 µg, and observation groups, respectively." Anti-TNF Therapy For Psoriatic Arthritis May Improve Physical Disability, Quality Of Life. According to a study published in the March issue of Arthritis Care & Research, "treatment with anti-tumor necrosis factor (TNF) agents can significantly improve physical disability and quality of life for patients with psoriatic arthritis." In a study of 596 patients, researchers found that "at six months, patients undergoing anti-TNF therapy had improved on the physical component scale of the Short Form (SF)-36 health survey instrument from a mean score of 19.1 to a mean of 29.3." In addition, scores "on the mental component scale...had risen from a mean of 41.7 to 48.8." Anti-TNF therapy drugs included in the study were etanercept, infliximab, and adalimumab. Combination Therapy For Some Alzheimer's Patients May Help Ease Caregiver Distress. According to research presented at a geriatric psychiatry meeting, "caregiver distress is significantly attenuated when patients with moderate to severe Alzheimer's disease (AD) are treated with a combination of extended-release memantine plus a cholinesterase inhibitor (ChEI) vs. ChEI monotherapy." Researchers came to this conclusion after randomizing "335 patients with a diagnosis of probable AD who had been undergoing stable ChEI therapy for at least three months...to extended-release memantine, 28 mg daily, and another 342 patients" to placebo, then following them for 24 weeks. Quetiapine Associated With More Rapid Onset Of Metabolic Disturbances In Elderly Patients. According to a study presented at a geriatric psychiatry meeting, "the antipsychotic quetiapine (Seroquel, AstraZeneca) is associated with a more rapid onset of metabolic disturbances than other antipsychotics in elderly patients with no baseline metabolic abnormalities before treatment initiation." In a study of 231 outpatients aged 70 and older treated for "psychosis, depression, bipolar disorders, or dementia," researchers found that "time to onset of hyperglycemia was significantly shorter among patients treated with quetiapine at 17.5 months, compared with patients who were treated with olanzapine at 32.6 months or risperidone at 36.3 months." References:http://www.medscape.com/viewarticle/718261http://www.medpagetoday.com/OBGYN/Pregnancy/21833http://online.wsj.com/article/BT-CO-20100819-715016.htmlhttp://consumer.healthday.com/Article.asp?AID=642267http://www.guardian.co.uk/society/2010/aug/20/price-cancer-drug-herceptinhttp://newsinfo.iu.edu/news/page/normal/13738.htmlDisclaimer- The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.Http://www.drshrutibhat.comExpert at leading Pharmaceutical R&D.Translates innovative concepts to PROFITS.YouTube Channel : Http://www.youtube.com/user/ShrutiBhat10 Introducing ! A new blog- Http://www.PharmaceuticalCareerDevelopment.blogspot.com which contains articles on motivation, career counselling and coaching, job search strategies, personal branding etc. especially for pharma professionals. Do you have questions for the author?
 The Wall Street Journal reported that the FDA proposed to remove brand and generic versions of low-blood pressure drug ProAmatine (midodrine hydrochloride) from the market because required post-marketing studies on the drug's effectiveness have yet to be conducted. The drug was approved under the FDA's accelerated approval program, and according to the Journal, this is the first time the agency is requesting a drug to be removed from the market because a company failed to conduct the follow-up studies that are required. Patients who use midodrine should stop taking it and consult their doctors about other types of anti-hypotension treatment, the FDA said in a statement." Norman Stockbridge, an FDA official said, "Since, evidence to confirm the drug's benefit has not be yet provided to the FDA, it is pursuing a withdrawal of the product." Shire "has been given 15 days to respond in writing or lose its right to appeal. Makers of the generic versions of the drug were given 30 days." The FDA "letter does not cite any safety or effectiveness problems with the drug, and suggests the action is primarily aimed at enforcing drug approval regulations that have not always been enforced." The drug was approved to treat "orthostatic hypotension." Malaria sufferers might be able to protect themselves against life-threatening bouts of the disease by taking a single course of antibiotics, research in mice has shown.Preventive treatment with 'needle-free' antibiotic vaccines could be used to control the infection in areas with high levels of transmission, a study published in Science Translational Medicine suggests. There are still no available vaccines against malaria. And although some antibiotics with anti-malarial properties, such as doxycycline, that kill the parasites directly are already in use as one-off, short-term prophylaxis, their prolonged use is not an option for millions of people in the developing world where malaria is endemic. Now, azithromycin and clindamycin, two common antibiotics, have been shown to provide additional and long-term protection against malaria, even after they are no longer taken. "The combination of the prophylactic effect with the subsequent immune-mediated protection may be enough to protect population groups at risk, such as infants and young children, from severe forms of malaria," according to Steffen Borrmann, a lead author of the study and parasitologist at the Kenya Medical Research Institute, told SciDev.Net.The team treated mice with the antibiotics before infecting them with malaria. After taking the drugs, the mice developed vaccine-like immunity lasting at least 40 days, and almost all were protected from complications that are often lethal.It is still not clear how long the immunity would last in humans, but Borrmann told SciDev.Net that "life-long would be the ultimate goal but we would be happy to achieve 1-2 year protection, [to last] during the most critical years in early childhood in high transmission areas". The antibiotics work by causing small cavities in malaria parasites during their passage into the liver of the infected host. This stops the parasites from entering the blood stream, giving time for the immune system to launch a sustained defence against the parasites.This mode of action is similar to experimental vaccines that use weakened whole parasites to elicit an immune response. The tested antibiotics are available as safe, generic drugs and there are no patent issues preventing their use in clinical trials or in clinical practise. But they would likely not work in areas with low transmission levels since the degree of immunity to subsequent infections depends on the quantity of malarial parasites already infecting the patient.Oral Contraceptives May Reduce Risk Of Death From Any Cause In Women. "Women who have taken the Pill at any stage in their life are less likely to die from any cause -- including heart disease and all types of cancer -- than those who have never taken the oral contraceptive," according to research published online in the British Medical Journal. The study of "more than 46,000 women...revealed a slightly higher risk of dying among under-45s." But, the slightly increased risk in younger women disappears within 10 years of stopping the pill. Researchers calculated that "there were 52 fewer deaths per 100,000 'women years' -- a composite measure of the number of women and the lengths of their lives -- among all women who had ever used the pill compared with those who had never used it. The effects may only be true for women who have taken older-style pills rather than those on newer type drugs." In younger women, "the effects...were also mainly seen in those who smoked, had high blood pressure, or were otherwise at risk of heart disease." "Women on the pill did have higher rates of violent and accidental death, through the researchers said they couldn't explain the findings." Notably, "the risk was seen in earlier analyses of the data, and has persisted through the years. Hormonal Contraceptives May Not Be Effective In Overweight Or Obese Women. Hormonal contraceptives may not be effective for contraception in overweight or obese women," according to a review published online in the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. After performing a literature review encompassing "11 trials enrolling a total of 39,531 women," researchers found that "pregnancy risk for overweight or obese women was higher in one of three studies using BMI." In fact, "compared with women with a BMI of less than 25 kg/m2, women with a BMI of 25 kg/m2 or more had higher risk for pregnancy in this trial of two combination oral contraceptives." Osteoporosis drug linked to irregular heart beat. Women who take popular osteoporosis drug alendronate, known more commonly as Fosamax, are twice as likely to develop a common form of irregular heartbeat compared to those who have never taken it, suggests a new study published in the journal Archives of Internal Medicine. Researchers analyzed data from more than 700 women who had been diagnosed with atrial fibrillation, or irregular heartbeat, in a three-year period and compared them to a control group of more than 900 randomly selected women. They found a nearly two-fold increase in risk for developing atrial fibrillation among those women who had ever taken alendronate. The findings were compiled by researchers from Group Health and the University of Washington by analyzing records of patients enrolled in Group Health, a Seattle-based non-profit health-care centre. Alendronate is part of a family of drugs known as bisphosphonates, which are widely used to protect against bone loss and prevent bone fracture in osteoporosis patients. However, the researchers did not find a difference in risk among those who had taken Fosamax in the past versus current users. “We do not conclude that the risk is higher for past use than current use. We conclude that the risk is higher for ever use than for never use, which was our original hypothesis,” reported lead study author Dr. Susan Heckbert, a professor of epidemiology and scientific investigator in the cardiovascular health research unit at the University of Washington. Heckbert stated that the next step would be for scientists to investigate the mechanism for how alendronate may influence the onset of atrial fibrillation. Marlene Gauthier, manager of public affairs for Merck Frosst Canada, responded to the findings by saying that a clinical trial, rather than an observational study such as this one, is the best way to evaluate a drug’s benefits and risks. “While observational analyses are usually conducted in as rigorous a manner as possible, they are associated with inherent limitations, including factors that cannot be adequately controlled for and an ability to fully account for differences in risk factors between groups. this underscores why data from randomized, controlled clinical trials are considered to be the most reliable source of information about the efficacy and safety of medicines.” The statement continued: “We strongly recommend that if patients have concerns about Fosamax that they talk to their physician. Osteoporosis is a serious medical condition and requires appropriate treatment with physician oversight. Their physician is in the best position to understand the needs of the patient and explain the benefits and risks of any given therapy to the patient.” “This is an observational study. It is not as strong a design as a clinical trial,” Heckbert acknowledged. “But on the other hand, it does represent what’s happening in actual clinical medicine.” Heckbert stated that her team knew of previous study findings that suggested a link between bisphosphonates and an increased risk for atrial fibrillation. In fact, in the United States there are more than 400 cases pending against Merck in both state and federal court, in which people who have taken Fosamax claim that the drug has contributed to the development of osteonecrosis of the jaw. This happens when bone tissue dies after it loses its blood supply, and can occur after trauma to the bone, such as a dental procedure.However, Heckbert warned that patients who take alendronate should not stop taking it due to her study’s findings. If individuals are concerned they should speak with their physician or their health-care provider. For patients who are at high risk of fracture, the benefits of alendronate or other bisphosphonates will generally outweigh the risk of atrial fibrillation.” References:http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748704868604575433703888376436.htmlhttp://www.google.com/hostednews/afp/article/ALeqM5gX0oxFR_ZpHn-RyPL8JkXqWD4PNghttp://www.usatoday.com/news/health/2010-08-16-fda-unproven-drug_N.htmhttp://www.medpagetoday.com/ProductAlert/Prescriptions/21699http://www.latimes.com/health/boostershots/la-heb-hypotension-drug-20100816,0,53066.story?track=rsshttp://www.startribune.com/business/100813309.html?elr=KArks8c7PaP3E77K_3c::D3aDhUMEaPc:E7_ec7PaP3iUiD3aPc:_Yyc:aU7DYaGEP7vDEh7P:DiUshttp://www.bizjournals.com/philadelphia/stories/2010/08/16/daily8.htmlhttp://www.theheart.org/article/1110411.dohttp://www.medscape.com/viewarticle/725103http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20614470?dopt=Abstracthttp://stm.sciencemag.org/content/2/40/40ra49.full?ijkey=OAfu5Q9bUdH4Q&keytype=ref&siteid=scitransmedhttp://www.pharm-education.com/2010/08/malaria-sufferers-might-be-able-to.htmlDisclaimer- The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.Http://www.drshrutibhat.comExpert at leading Pharmaceutical R&D.Translates innovative concepts to PROFITS.YouTube Channel : Http://www.youtube.com/user/ShrutiBhat10 Introducing ! A new blog- Http://www.PharmaceuticalCareerDevelopment.blogspot.com which contains articles on motivation, career counselling and coaching, job search strategies, personal branding etc. especially for pharma professionals.Do you have questions for the author?
 Dr.Shruti Bhat, Star formulator and Ace leader within pharmaceutical R&D, a specialist with hiTech formulations and quality-by-design. Shruti brings to you some highlights from current pharma and clinical research news, views and data. FDA Approves First-Ever Human Test Of Embryonic Stem Cell-Based Therapy. The USFDA has approved "the world's first authorized test in people of a therapy derived from human embryonic stem cells." The clinical trial "could offer the first glimpse of the safety and possible effectiveness of a technology that has been hailed for its vast medical promise but also embroiled in political and ethical controversy." The trial "will test cells developed by the Geron Corporation and the University of California, Irvine in patients with new spinal cord injuries." Geron "plans to enroll eight to 10 patients in the study at sites nationwide. The trial" for its GRNOPC1 therapy "will take about two years, with each patient being studied for one year." The Wall Street Journal noted that Geron began the study in early 2009, but it was stopped due to concerns in an animal study showing an increased frequency of small cysts within the injury site. Thomas Okarma, Geron's president and chief executive officer, said the FDA's decision strengthens the company's ability to start similar trials in the future. Scientists Create New Family Of "Super-Antibotics." A new family of "'super-antibotics' capable of beating MRSA (Methicillin resistant Staph. aureus) and other deadly infections” reports a study published in the journal ‘Nature’. In tests, one of the drugs killed strains of the hospital superbug resistant to antibiotics already in use. Others were more than a match for other potentially lethal germs, including food poisoning bug E. coli, and acinetobacter, [which] is even harder to treat than MRSA." The drugs have been heralded as "an important step forward in the race against antibiotic resistance." The new drugs work in a similar way to quinolones. However, the new drugs attach to an enzyme needed for reproduction in a different place, "meaning they can kill bugs that are resistant." New Antibiotic Designed To Circumvent Drug Resistance. GlaxoSmithKline Plc, the UK's biggest drugmaker, said it has come up with a new antibiotic designed to circumvent the drug resistance that makes many hospital-acquired infections difficult to treat." Glaxo's new compound "latches onto topoisomerase, which helps bacteria produce proteins and replicate," according to the paper published in Nature. It "connects at a different location on the enzyme from existing drugs." Glaxo's "finding, still years from being commercialized, is significant" at a time "few pharmaceutical companies are producing new medicines to combat rising rates of drug-resistant infections in hospitals”. Misoprostol May Revolutionize Abortion Around The World. Researchers are finding an alternative" to abortions "that is safe, cheap, and very difficult for governments to restrict -- misoprostol." Misoprostol "pills are beginning to revolutionize abortion around the world, especially in poor countries." The drug "is very widely available and can't easily be banned, because it is also used for ulcers and can save lives of women with postpartum hemorrhages."
References-http://www.nytimes.com/2010/08/01/opinion/01kristof.html?src=mvhttp://www.dailymail.co.uk/health/article-1300484/MRSA-E-Coli-treated-new-breed-antibiotics.html http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2010-08-04/glaxo-antibiotic-finding-looms-large-in-drug-market-with-few-new-products.html http://www.nytimes.com/2010/07/31/health/research/31stem.html?_r=1&ref=ushttp://www.google.com/hostednews/ap/article/ALeqM5gON1ck-mYcLt7R0U9XC_71Lzo1LQD9H9HQB80http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748703999304575399312648917190.htmlhttp://www.bloomberg.com/news/2010-07-30/geron-cleared-by-fda-to-test-embryonic-stem-cell-treatment-shares-climb.htmlhttp://pagingdrgupta.blogs.cnn.com/2010/07/30/landmark-embryonic-stem-cell-study-to-proceed/http://content.usatoday.com/communities/sciencefair/post/2010/07/stem-cell-spinal-cord-injury-clinical-trial-human-fda/1http://www.ft.com/cms/s/322baf24-9c01-11df-a7a4-00144feab49a,Authorised=false.html?_i_location=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.ft.com%2Fcms%2Fs%2F0%2F322baf24-9c01-11df-a7a4-00144feab49a.html%3Fftcamp%3Drss&_i_referer=http%3A%2F%2Fsn129w.snt129.mail.live.com%2Fmail%2FInboxLight.aspx%3Fn%3D757275366&ftcamp=rsshttp://www.politicsdaily.com/2010/07/30/fda-oks-embryonic-stem-cell-trials-for-humans/http://www.pharm-education.com/2010/08/scientists-create-new-family-of-super.html Disclaimer- The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.Http://www.drshrutibhat.comExpert at leading Pharmaceutical R&D.Translates innovative concepts to PROFITS.YouTube Channel : Http://www.youtube.com/user/ShrutiBhat10
|